Frederic Lepied wrote: > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> David Walser wrote: >> > Pixel wrote: >> >> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >>> Given that, it seems to me the best thing for services >> >>> we don't want enabled by default on installation, is >> >>> to just have them not run _post_service in the SPEC >> >>> file. They'll get chkconfig --add run when they're >> >>> enabled, and they don't lose the list of runlevels >> >>> they should be run in. >> >> >> >> agreed (i don't see any pb doing so, except having rpmlint whining, >> >> but that's ok :) >> >> >> >> for example, packages that don't a working default config file should >> >> do this.. >> > >> > Great :D. Luckily most of the packages I once thought shouldn't start by default >> > have either been improved, or I'm just only now smart enough to realize they're >> > OK :o). The only one that's still questionable in my eyes is ypbind. >> > >> > For now, the only packages I know that did the "-" thing in their initscript are >> > apcupsd, nscd, and routed, so those need to be fixed. Do you know of any others? >> >> Actually last we discussed this ypserv also did the "-" thing so if that's still >> the case it should be fixed also. The fact that it did that makes the case for >> doing it in ypbind stronger too. > > AFAIK ypserv isn't doing the - thing. Where do you see this ?
When me and Pixel first discussed this long ago he quoted to me ypserv's chkconfig line as an example of doing the - thing. It may have since been changed, I haven't checked. BTW, did you remove the associated rpmlint error yet?
