I'll try it on a fresh cooker install. The one I did it on was up to date for today, but the install was from a few days ago and I had been keeping it current with urpmi.Is it reproducable with another package? Here I can see no problems..
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
- [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness Frank Griffin
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness François Pons
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness Frank Griffin
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdnes... Frank Griffin
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness Frank Griffin
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdnes... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weir... Frank Griffin
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. u... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake v... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. u... Lyvim Xaphir
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness Charles A Edwards
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake vs. urpmi weirdness Frank Griffin
