RE: [Cooker] secure kernel SMP

[Geoffrey Lee]

> HI All,
> 
> Please excuse my stupidness, but explain me please, why the 
> secure kernel should
> necessarily be SMP? I'm not at all confident in SMP in 2.2.x and 
> wouldn't like to
> deal with it, especially on an uniprocess machine.
> 


smp kernels will work on uniprocessor ones too, or should, anyway.
umm, for now, recompile ? ;p



> Thank you in advance
> 
> Alexander
>