On Wed 06 Aug 2003 14:41, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below: > On Wed Aug 06 13:18 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > On Wed 06 Aug 2003 12:12, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below: > > > On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, Fran�ois Pons wrote: > > > > * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.93-1mdk > > > > > > > > - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and > > > > internal rpm pubkey. > > > > > > Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? > > > > > > If it does, then I worship the ground on which you walk... > > > > It hasn't been prompting me every since I updated the RPM GPG database > > with the PLF key (as we originally had to do with the Mdk keys as well, > > when rpm 4.2 came out, as the initial packages didn't import them > > automatically). > > I've attempted numerous times, using different downloads of the PLF key, > to import into rpm... no dice.
Did you read the man page and import the key using the procedure (and type of key=ascii-armored) there? I've had no problems doing that. Note that at least originally, each key had to be within its own ascii-armored file, not several combined into one file, or it could corrupt the RPM db. If you've tried multiple times and did it wrong say the first time, perhaps that's what happened and it will import no new keys, tho perhaps the damage isn't so bad and the mdk keys continue to work. Other than that, about all I can say is it worked here, which doesn't of course offer any explanation of why it might fail there, unfortunately. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
