Am Mittwoch, 13. August 2003 16:38 schrieb Svetoslav Slavtchev: > Quoting Steffen Barszus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Am Dienstag, 12. August 2003 23:08 schrieb Svetoslav Slavtchev: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > i uploaded mod_dvb-1.0.0 (and i think almost all my 2.4.22.0.2mdk > > > > patches) > > > > > to http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/mdk-cook/for_tmb/ > > > > > > > > > and the kernel team could also look into them :( > > > > mod_dvb-1.0.0 is important since it would not make any sense to ship a > > PREx > > > > version. But I guess that applies to other patches on your site too. Has > > the > > > > devfsd.conf part of this go to devfsd package ? I would really love to > > see having dvb working of the box. > > the devfsd.conf part ? > you mean the module loading & configuration ? > this should be done by harddrake probably.
Dunno. The entries in modules.conf for sure. I base my knowledge mainly on the dvb-modules RPM of Guido Draheim. This RPM does work well on 9.1, all the things he has done in there just need to be integrated somehow in 9.2 . He has : REGISTER ^dvb/adapter[0-9]+/[^/]+$ PERMISSIONS root.video 0660 REGISTER ^ost/video[0-9]+$ PERMISSIONS root.video 0660 REGISTER ^v4l/[^/]+[0-9]+$ PERMISSIONS root.video 0660 in /etc/devfs/conf.d/dvb-modules.conf . If this has to be done with harddrake, I will put it in the bugreport on harddrake I want to file once i can actually post something to bugzilla (failed the last days) > but you might want to take a look at driver.marvel init script, > and tweak it for mod_dvb > (i took the idea from driver.mtx /or smth like this/ from linuxtv.org ) With the allready mentioned entries in /etc/modules.conf etc. it would be enough to modprobe -r dvb-ttpci . This will be done inside the runlevelscript of vdr. The vdr-runlevelscript needs to reload the driver if something bad happened (crash of the firmware and things like that). This is allmost all ready, just some finetuning of it will be done. Loading/reloading/deloading of all the modules inside that rc-script would make it a way to complex and shouldn't belong to the runlevelscript, but be configured in modules.conf. If there is no chance to get it in harddrake for 9.2 , i will need a dirty hack. Steffen
