On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:56:23AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: > That's why I made the suggestion to use: > > urpmi `cat packages.list` > instead of > for i in `cat packages.list`;do urpmi $i;done > > You let urpmi compute dependencies a few hundred times doing it the 2nd > way, which does take a while.
One other possible problem with that is if you had packages installed that don't exist (maybe something you packaged locally) or that have changed names without providing the old name, then urpmi will barf on the whole thing... -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "What upsets me is not that you lied to me, but that from now on I can no longer believe you." -- Nietzsche
