Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Thomas Backlund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > doing a lilo -v5 shows: > > > > Calling map_insert_data > > fd 5: REISERFS_IOC_UNPACK > > fd 5: offset 2560 -> dev 0xe0, LBA 8011921 > > fd 5: REISERFS_IOC_UNPACK > > fd 5: offset 3072 -> dev 0xe0, LBA 8011922 > > > > the same goes on and on and on.... > > seems it's about to scan every block on reiserfs... > > booh. lilo-22.5.X seems really not stable... I'm wondering if the best > solution would not be to switch to lilo-22.4.1 ...
You have my vote. Never had any problems with recent lilo releases until now. We just can't afford to get a problematic release. /me spend 8 hours in single usermode figuring out a double problem with lilo. One caused by lilo and one in lilo. I was not amused. # Han -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
