On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:59:08PM -0400, Frank Griffin wrote:
Luca Berra wrote:
the subject should have read: broken super-freeswan package in contrib.

super-freeswan isn't broken unless it doesn't really need those packages. If it needs them and they aren't there, then the problem is that they aren't there.
super freeswan IS broken, it is a badly done port of a suse contrib
package http://www.m1b.de/content/know/opensource/freeswan

- gmp package does not exist, gmp is a library.
 actually super-freeswan needs libgmp.so.3, which is automatically
 found and added to provides by rpm when building the package.
- klips.. are kernel capabilities, which are stock in cooker kernels.
 if you want the package can be made to require a kernel >= (version
 where modular alg and ipsec-nat-traversal where added to the kernel)
- and it even obsoletes a main package (freeswan)

Are there guidelines/rules for coding subject lines here ? If so, where, please ?
there is no guideline on subject lines, except common sense.
what i was stating is that super-freeswan rpm _is_ broken.

regards,
L.

--
Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
       Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
 X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \



Reply via email to