On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:17:31 +0300
Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> %changelog
> * Sat Aug 16 2003 Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.4.22-0.5.1tmb_mdk
[...]
> - BadRAM support (udo)
[...]
I ran into problems with this patch.
While running the kernel with this patch, I couldn't get a kernel src.rpm
compiled, it broke 5 times in a different place. Using the same kernel without
the badram patch makes a kernel compile in the first attempt. I don't remember
having these random problems on my system for at least half a year, so I'd say
the badram patch is doing things it shouldn't do.
I use an smp Abit BP6 with 256 Mb sdram.
Are more people experiencing problems like this?
Output from dmidecode:
Handle 0x0009
DMI type 6, 12 bytes.
Memory Bank
Socket: DIMM3
Banks: 4 5
Speed: 8nS
Type:
Installed Size: 256Mbyte
Enabled Size: 256Mbyte
[...]
Handle 0x0022
DMI type 17, 21 bytes.
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x001F
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 64 bits
Size: 256 Mbyte
Form Factor: DIMM
Locator: DIMM3
Bank Locator: Bank4/5
Type: EDRAM
--
Marcel Pol
