http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4576
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-22-08 21:46 -------
Ok, I'm seeing it with your message. There is a bug in our message subject
(caract�ristique hasn't been quoted-printable encoded) but it is not trigerring
the evolution problem)..
Will investigate..
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: ASSIGNED
creation_date:
description:
Evolution seems to transform the charset of some of the messages I fetch from my
IMAP mailbox. It is hard to describe, thus I am going to show the differences
between what's stored on the server and what ends up in my evolution display.
The example concerns specifically one mail ; I list all headers and just the
first paragraph of the body. You'll see that :
1. The original "content-type" header is replaced by another one which appears
at the bottom of the headers
2. The mail body is wrongly translated in utf-8 characters (French accents)
whereas the "content-type" header still indicates iso-8859-1. The
"quoted-printable" encoding makes this quite clear (French accents are one
byte in iso-8859-1, and two in utf-8)
The net effect is that some of my e-mails become unreadable (broken French
accents).
********************
Here is the mail as stored on the IMAP server (I have an ssh access to it) :
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 20:49:55 2003
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44])
by miel.brainstorm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 68C6B1C89F0; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from h2h7n3 (pauguste-3-81-57-114-42.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.114.42])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9E413C240; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Pierre Mounier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:48:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Spip] Changer caract9ristiques des champs de saisie
"articles"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=7.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 28874
Pour ce coup-ci, je ne sais pas, mais je sais (par exp=E9rience) que
dans nombre de cas, c'est vraiment g=EAnant. Cela para=EEt idiot, mais il
est tr=E8s difficile de faire passer =E0 une communaut=E9 de r=E9dacteurs =
la
gymnastique qui consiste =E0 dire "pour les infos pratiques, c'est
P.S." ou "pour la biblio, c'est PGP", etc.
[snip]
********************
Here is the e-mail as displayed by Evolution when I choose "display source" :
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by
miel.brainstorm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C6B1C89F0; Thu, 7 Aug 2003
20:49:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from h2h7n3 (pauguste-3-81-57-114-42.fbx.proxad.net
[81.57.114.42]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E413C240;
Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:49:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Pierre Mounier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Antoine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:48:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Spip] Changer caract?9ristiques des champs de saisie
"articles"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a)
Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=7.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1
X-Evolution-Source: imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1143/
Pour ce coup-ci, je ne sais pas, mais je sais (par exp=C3=A9rience) que=20
dans nombre de cas, c'est vraiment g=C3=AAnant. Cela para=C3=AEt idiot, mai=
s il=20
est tr=C3=A8s difficile de faire passer =C3=A0 une communaut=C3=A9 de r=C3=
=A9dacteurs la=20
gymnastique qui consiste =C3=A0 dire "pour les infos pratiques, c'est=20
P.S." ou "pour la biblio, c'est PGP", etc.
[snip]
