uses
> > other problems.
> >
> > please -- a little attention to detail here. Bash needs to be fixed not
> > readline.
>
> Isn't it unwise to have a bash with static library's for normal use? Why
i don't see what is the problem, you might have an increse in size, but not
much. but if everything is statically link then i'd start freaking out.
> can't there exist to versions? Or why couldn't the script's before /usr is
> mounted use sash, or som other lightweight static shell?
>
AFAIK nupe not really, because init runs, then rc.sysinit runs, which is
actually a #!/bin/sh script see
#!/bin/sh
#
# /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit - run once at boot time
#
# Taken in part from Miquel van Smoorenburg's bcheckrc.
#
# Rerun ourselves through initlog
if [ -z "$IN_INITLOG" ]; then
[ -f /sbin/initlog ] && exec /sbin/initlog $INITLOG_ARGS -r
/etc/rc.d/rc.sysini
t
fi
# Set the path
PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin
export PATH
# Read in config data.
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/network ]; then
. /etc/sysconfig/network
else
NETWORKING=no
well , you know what that means ...
_and_
please read my other post, linux actually runs /bin/sh with execcve() ( and
not sash) (if it acutally works) if /etc/init /sbin/init et al fails.
> seb
>
