http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5175





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-09 19:06 -------
Fast as light is how it used to be for me too, like in 7.1 or 8.1, or if started
after machine has been up a while. What info do you want?

To reproduce:
1-Boot runlevel 3
2-Immediately login root as soon as prompt is available.
3-Immediately do 'mc' as soon as login succeeds.

Time to mc ready:
9.1 on K6/2-500: 2 minutes + 8 seconds
9.2rc1 on Pentium MMX 200: 1 minute + 56 seconds

To reproduce (alternate):
1-Boot runlevel 5
2-Immediately switch to tty1 when kdm appears
3-Immediately login root as soon as prompt is available.
4-Immediately do 'mc' as soon as login succeeds.

Time to me ready:
9.1 on K6/2-500: 1 minute + 55 seconds
9.2rc1 on Pentium MMX 200: 1 minute + 45 seconds

More comments:
The 9.2rc1 machine was upgraded from 9.1, but only because 9.2rc1 would not
install on it fresh. 

Performance was similar on two other machines besides these two, covering 6-7
installs of 9.1 & 9.2rc1.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEEDINFO
creation_date: 
description: 
mc startup has actually been fubar since at least 9.0, possibly before that, but
I can't remember. I haven't stopwatched it, but if started immediately upon 1st
login after boot, it must be taking at least one minute, a seeming eternity,
both in 9.1 and 9.2rc1. Upon entering mc at shell prompt, the screen is blanked,
cursor goes to bottom left, and nothing happens for a while. Eventually, some
liblow error messages quickly scroll up the screen too fast to read, and mc
becomes ready to use.  

Hardware is rather old, P200 for rc1, with 128 MB RAM & PCI graphics card, but
immaterially better on K6/2-500 with 256 MB RAM and same graphics adapter for
9.1, and on a P3-450 with 768 MB RAM and G450 graphics adapter..

Reply via email to