On Wednesday 03 September 2003 12:02, John Keller wrote:
> John Allen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:17, Radek Vybiral wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Robert Pollak wrote:
> > > > John Keller wrote:
> > > > > Cooker is always in flux but at certain moments, snapshots are
> > > > > made.
> > > >
> > > > Does this mean there will be no further stabilizing branch after 9.2,
>
> to
>
> > > >   eventually get a 9.2.1?
> > >
> > > You may get 9.2.1 = 9.2 + updates.
> >
> > Whilst this is true, it would perhaps be better to have a real 9.2.1,
>
> 9.2.2
>
> > etc....
> >
> > ie. official points in time that reflect a 9.2 + a specific set of
>
> updates.
>
> > the /etc/mandrake-release file should also say 9.2.1 etc...
>
> Yes, it would also be nice if crackers and researchers would stop trying to
> find security problems every day. And darned if fixes don't come out on a
> regular basis! :)
>

Jeez yeah that would be great; god damn crackers.

> I'm not sure what benefit having releases like this would give. Either
> you're patched or not. I can't think of any company that could devote
> resources to a new release on the schedule that a point-point release
> demands. Especially not any Linux distro company, who are all pulling a
> balancing act just maintaining a six-month cycle (or less).
>

I'm not talking about a new release; more like a bundled up set of patches.
Its easy to download patches from the net on a daily basis, but you'd be 
surprised how many people cannot do this, they simply don't have fact enough 
net access.

> Apple does this do point-point releases in name, but that's because they
> release hardware and the releases could be normal point releases if it
> weren't for marketing. Even Microsoft doesn't bother, and they love release
> (marketing) events.
>
> I think you're worried about the wrong thing. "Official" has little to do
> with the name of the product and everything to do with the source of the
> updates. If you're already getting those (through the nicely done Mandrake
> Update tool, natch), it certainly isn't "better" to slap a point name on
> them.
>
> - John

-- 
John Allen,                          Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MandrakeClub Silver Member.


Reply via email to