On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 04:09:28PM +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> gc's patch. ;-) Something like the following applied to aclocal.m4 or
> acinclude.m4 if you intend to regenerate the former:
> 
> @@ -1932,8 +1932,8 @@
>  shlibpath_overrides_runpath=unknown
>  version_type=none
>  dynamic_linker="$host_os ld.so"
> -sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib"
> -sys_lib_search_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib"
> +sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib /usr/X11R6/lib"
> +sys_lib_search_path_spec="/lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib"
> 
>  case $host_os in
>  aix3*)

I'll see if this works...

> Besides, configure seems to list:
>   --disable-rpath         Disable passing additional runtime library
>                           search paths
> doesn't it work?

On the packages that I've used chrpath on it didn't. :(

> Done, but I'd still prefer the right disabling of rpath without using 
> chrpath. I once saw a null DT_RPATH entry, it looks weird...

Agreed, but I'd rather get rid of the rpath sooner rather than later...
If I have to use chrpath as a hack to get the package out without an
rpath that's better than a package with an rpath or no package because I
don't have the time to fix the broken build system. :)

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

"What upsets me is not that you lied to me, but that from now on I can
no longer believe you." -- Nietzsche

Reply via email to