On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:18, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote: ... > > [1] Note the ellipses; since there was only one such suggestion > in the last days, I thought it was unambiguous - well, I know > better know ;-). > Assume nothing is often the way to go.
> [2] Well, for my defense I can say that though I use Linux since > the version 0.9 days I never had a need to configure (and > compile) a kernel myself. Yep, most times it simply worked, > and for critical systems, there was always some "kernel-guy" > around. Yep. A while ago, Chmou decided and managed to give us a kernel-source rpm ready to go. I just assume it is not easy to do right now. A standard user should not be required to compile anything anyhow. Dealing with the kernel requires a knowledge that most advanced users don't even have (a very good book is online though). That is surely why NVidia decided to go with this awkward installer, I assume. I'd say it was easier before, but thanks to Cooker for keeping me awake. -- _ _ _ _ | |_____| | |_/ | | / / -_) | / / | |_\_\___|_|_\_\_| @ sbcglobal.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
