On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 19:01, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > In this case functionality does not dictate that the default fonts look > bad. It is possible, and preferred, to have good form and function at > the same time.
You seem to have lost track of the argument. It moved from "should we stop having helvetica as the preferred font?" (to which everyone seems to agree the answer is "yes") to "what should we replace it with?", with some arguing for a specific font - verdana or arial or whatever - followed by sans-serif, with others arguing for the generic alias first, followed by the specific font name. -- adamw
