> Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 02:47, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>>On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote: 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>no. 
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>> 
> >>>I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away  
> >>>anyway, and it's a simple way to fund your favourite distro. It's not  
> >>>as if we're seeing in-yer-face popups or anything. 
> >>> 
> >>>Cheers; Leon 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >> 
> >>me doesn't use screensaver :) 
> >>nor default bookmarks :) 
> >> 
> >>about the install  
> >>( may be will skip a CD install  and will use urpmi.update && urpmi
> >>--autoselect ) 
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >My point wasn't really about whether it affected us directly. Obviously
> >it won't - given that we use Cooker, I don't know if we'll even ever
> >*see* the offending adverts. The point is I think it's a horrible way of
> >generating revenue which is being introduced by stealth - I only found
> >out about this because OSNews discovered the page and flagged it up in a
> >news story, I haven't seen anything from a Mandrake source announcing
> >this, and it hasn't been mentioned on this list at all, which seems a
> >little odd. I'm more concerned with the horribly unprofessional
> >impression that an installation and first boot sequence plastered with
> >adverts will have on a new user, compared to distributions which have
> >none.

sorry for the missunderstanding, i completely agree.

if this "advertized" Mandrake was the first i try to install,
i would probably never try it again, and probably never go for a boxed
version.

i still disslike SuSE, because they use closed installer,
and there are no free install CD, and i think i would have 
similer impression from Mandrake.

> >
> Interesting. People on this list seem only mention how *not* to generate 
> cash.
> 
> This product is being developed by a company, i.e bills, salaries and 
> taxes need to be paid.
> 
> Instead of complaining on how not to generate cash, could we perhaps 
> focus on finding an acceptable way for the $$$ to flow into mdk. We 
> (contributors) will also benefit from it.
> 
> Perhaps we can make a topic on the wiki discussing this.

this is a very good idea, and probably a lot better then such advertizments
 

best,

svetljo

-- 
COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
--------------------------------------------------
1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger!
2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit�tssieger!
3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post


Reply via email to