I could agree if apt and urpmi were only for the same purpose, but did urpmi-parallel (possibility to install on many differents machines of a cluster -may be a subnetwork-) exists for apt for example ?
If this feature is so great, why don't include it in apt4rpm ? Both are opensource, no ?
If you want a merge of apt and get, you'll be sure that within one month another tool will come to add another feature ...
If this feature is great, why it could not be integrated ? Is it an ego issue ? It's not diversity, it's dispersion and it's not effective.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous ! http://search.msn.fr
