Ainsi parlait Jan Ciger :
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> | I hate to say that, but I agree. But I let you also know that we
> | also have internal communications problems, and I also learnt
> | from linuxfr.org the presence of the mandrake page with the price
> | of ads :/.
>
> Wow, if even Mandrakesoft's employees didn't know, I guess the problems
> are much worse than just one botched press release. I hope you manage to
> fix whatever is broken, because this fracas didn't contribute to good
> image of Mandrake Linux and Mandrakesoft.
Maybe the image shouldn't mask the reality too much. Mandrakesoft is a
standard corporation, with bosses and employees. The communauty involvement
has been made possible by some of these employees, and we all know that they
are other developpers that don't give a fuck about us. And the real decision
process stays in management hand anyway.
I can't say I enjoy the situation, but I find whining every time this is
clearly demonstrated a bit... na�ve ?
--
Guillaume Rousse
Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts
which are unobtainable and three parts which are still under development
-- Murphy's Laws on Technology n�23
