Le dim 14/09/2003 � 07:59, Oden Eriksson a �crit : > # urpmi apache > Why is the apache1 stuff chosen?
Because you did "urpmi apache". If you want to install 2.0 do a "urpmi apache2". But I agree that the apache/php/mod_ssl dependencies are not playing well with urpmi... specially when using both cooker and contribs. > apache2-2.0.47 should provide apache = 2.0.47 > apache2-mod_ssl should provide mod_ssl = 2.0.47 > apache2-mod_php should provide (what?) > This would probably upgrade apache1 to apache2, but would that matter now? Yes, it matters... Apache 2 is the worst piece of crap I have ever seen. It's bugged, php is not really stable, perl is not yet at 2.0 (it's 1.99), CGI scripts don't work correctly when used with perl -w (the stderr blocks at 4K), etc. -- Jean-Michel Dault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
