http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4862
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-09 13:31 ------- Thierry, I am not sure i understand your message. It sounds as you actually want fsck to check journalled drives, while, in my experience, the journal update at mount is much safer than fsck (which doesn't use the journal to restore, but just fixes incorrect stuff, which usually means: deletes incorrect stuff). -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------- Reminder: ------- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: UNCONFIRMED creation_date: description: Many people are tempted to press "Y" after an unclean shutdown so that (according to message) filesystem gets checked. But for ext3 this runs fsck, which has a big chance of destroying files (somehow, it seems that it destroys more on ext3 than on ext2). please: - remove the message altogether from rc.sysinit for journalling fs (an expert can still do it manually, if for some reason it is wanted) - make the check sound like a bad idea. d.
