Robert Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Two questions - > > 1) I know it's too late, but why do we have 1.2.7 version and not 1.2.9 > of tightvnc?
Frankly, i didn't see this one :(. Guillaume's bot didn't tell me that a new version was avalaible. BTW, it seems that we are the only distro which superseded genuine vnc by tightvnc (at least Redhat and Suse don't). > 2) What is the difference now between RealVNC and TightVNC (if any?) http://www.tightvnc.org/intro.html
