On Thu Sep 25, 2003 at 10:33:35PM -0700, James Sparenberg wrote:

> > > > Heck, I'm all for it and agree with all your reasons. But the example
> > > > is a touch out... wu-ftpd hasn't been in main since 8.2 (last version
> > > > it shipped in main).
> > > >
> > > > Hey, while we're at it, can we throw sendmail in contribs? =)
> > > >
> > > > (Serious about killing wu-ftpd altogether, semi-serious about
> > > > sendmail)
> > > 
> > > To give a serious answer (like I got any authority in this :)
> > > No we can't ditch sendmail. Too many people rely and like sendmail. And
> > > it's not that evil. I mean there are some periods in which no exploits
> > > are found in sendmail.
> > 
> > The same could be said of wu-ftpd, tho.  There was the one issue in July,
> > and previous to that was Nov 2001.  So from 11/01->07/03 it was pretty
> > quiet.  I guarantee you in that timeframe sendmail has had more security
> > issues.
> > 
> > > But what we can do is keeping a close eye or even import the sendmail in
> > > OpenBSD-cvs which is audited. Same thing goes for BIND. I don't know how
> > > practical this is but it sounds like something to contemplate.
> > 
> > Is openbsd using bind9 yet?  Or are they still on bind4?  If they are using
> > bind9, I have my doubts that it's been audited... that's a lot of code to
> > audit so quickly, especially considering how long they left bind4 in there.
> 
> One of the reasons the update took so long is that they are auditing the
> code *grin*  I checked 3.2 OpenBSD and it does run 9.21  I'm told that
> the do do a legit "cheat" when auditing.  They first "recheck" the code
> that didn't change and then repair.  Then audit what is left.  However I
> don't know enough about the process there to comment beyond this.

Hmmm.. that sounds interesting.  I wonder if the bind folks know about
this... I'm sure it would be nice to have whatever fixes are commited to
openbsd-cvs put back into bind itself.

> > On the sendmail side, I'm not sure.  Is it up to date?  We won't win any
> > friends by regressing to an older-but-openbsd-audited version.
> 
> They don't have sendmail in the files list.  It's postfix there.

Well at least they're doing that right... =)

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
"lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to