Hi! On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:19:44 +0200 Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May you give your opinion on : > - What was wrong in 9.2 development process? > - What could we do to improve 9.3/10.0 development. - mdk seems to develop/change their own tools (Drak* - with the exception of urpmi and rpmdrake) just before the release, with sometimes major changes even after a release candidate. If this stuff would be finished earlier, it could be tested in cooker. - some mdk developers don't seem to use/like bugzilla?! - some packages have a maintainer who is not really the maintainer of this package (i.e. most changes are done by someone else), so a bug report isn't assigned to the correct person. A proposal how development/mdk could be a bit different: - change release cycle for full blown releases to about once a year - provide updates for packages (or group of packages) when ready (i.e. copy them into main if "no bugs" are left...) - maybe provide update CDs from time to time I guess this or similar things were proposed several times now, but distribution through MdkClub seems to be an option now. > - What should we do to improve the Wiki. It would be nice if it could post change notifications not only once a day but at once. I also don't like the time consuming process to get an account for it. Everyone should be able to get one as easy as a bugzilla account. > - Should we have cooker snapshot ISOs? That would be similar to the above model - but it would give the normal user the advantage that those released packages are tested a bit... -- Michael Reinsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mr.uue.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
