http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5377


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|program                     |Installation
            Product|bootloader-utils            |Installation
            Version|1.6-3mdk                    |1.847




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-30-09 23:52 -------
I have just finished a new testinstall with a fully synced Cooker,

that uses DrakX v. 1.847 and this problem still exists...

and this bug does _not_ have anything to do with bootloader-utils,
since if I install the 2.6 kernel using rpm the symlinks does not change...

so afaik it's DrakX / drakboot that is messing up ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: NEW
creation_date: 
description: 
When installing standard kernel-2.4.22.5mdk-1-1mdk from main and 
kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.3mdk-1-1mdk from contribs during install 
the initrd.img and vmlinuz symlinks in /boot points to the 2.6 kernel: 
 
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root  root  29 syys 8  2003 initrd.img 
->initrd-2.6.0-0.test4.3mdk.img 
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root  root  26 syys 8  2003 vmlinuz  
->vmlinuz-2.6.0-0.test4.3mdk 
 
This is _bad_ since the lilo options linux, linux-nonfb and failsafe all use:  
image=/boot/vmlinuz 
initrd=/boot/initrd.img 
as their kernel choice... 
 
This will lead to users trying to fix their broken systems most likely 
ending up with more problems, since without they knowing it, they will 
be booting into an 2.6 test-kernel :-( 
 
And this is definately an installer bug since all contrib kernels 
are using -L parameter with /sbin/installkernel, and installing 
a 2.6 kernel _after_ a newly installed system has been rebooted into, 
won't trigger this behaviour.... 
 
Regards 
 
Thomas

Reply via email to