Every new release, there is the same question: what for the next version ? And everytime, this is the same never-ending thread mixing trivial suggestion to upgrade foo-0.1.1.1.1 to foo-0.1.1.1.2beta and utopic request for being taken account by management.
So i'd like to propose a small, limited, simple policy about HOW to discuss distribution evolutions. First, simple package evolution. No need to ask, they have always been automatically upgraded. Don't worry, there will be foo-0.1.1.1.2beta as soon as it will be available. Second, simple feature addition. A simple mail should be enough. For instance, my own list for 9.2 was http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker&m=104889039014087&w=2 Third, policy or functionning change. This is way more difficult to discuss, especially when appearing in a middle of a long, long thread. So i think those suggestion sould deserve their own thread, and use wiki as a way to offer a resume of the discussion once achieved, not for leading the discussion itself. The discussion about the mirror structures we already had falls in this category: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker&m=106077548518257&w=2 WDYT ? -- When you are in a hurry, the needle eye is always too small -- Murphy's Laws of Sewing n�5
