Submitted 25-Jun-00 by Guillaume Rousse:
> OK, i removed dev=xxx argument, then mount -a. Nothing changed.
> Aniway, how is supposed supermount to know which device use when i remove those
> entries ?
>
I think your mail agent didn't format correctly for you. It's not the
dev= options, it is the noauto options that need removal :)
HTH
--
_
_|_|_
( ) * Anton Graham
/v\ / <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/( )X
(m_m) GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount support in kernel 2.2.16... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount support in kernel 2.2.16... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount support in kernel 2... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount support in kern... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount support in ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount support... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermount su... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermoun... m . rokos
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermoun... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermoun... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermoun... Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermoun... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Still no supermoun... Anton Graham
