onsdagen den 8 oktober 2003 02.57 skrev Stew Benedict:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > The point was to use /var/www/html/%{name} for every application, and to
> > use FHS compliant location for non-web files. If you have a configuration
> > directory for anthill, it seems for me more logical to use /etc/anthill
> > for it than /var/www/anthill/etc, for instance. The same could be said
> > for include, that should rather go into /usr/share/anthill.
>
> Keep in mind that FHS is strongly pushing /srv, such as /srv/www now for
> apache and other services. (hosted files, not configs)
As stupid as the /package stuff by DJB. What's the point?
