Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2003 14:21 schrieb Tibor Pittich: > on 13. oct 2003 on 07:53, Giuseppe Ghib? wrote: > > Tibor Pittich ha scritto: > > >today, i instaled postfix with amavis-new, spamassassin and clamav > > >support. postfix have number 80 as starting reference, same as > > >spamassassin and clamav. amavis-new have 79. > > >imho, it will be more clean if all mail preprocessors are started before > > >starting mta and optionally before amavis. > > > > > >what are you think about this? > > > > IMHO it is right to have amavisd-new started before postfix, because > > postfix will open later it opens content filters scanners pipes, AFAIK. > > yes, you are right, but amavis-new is ok in this case. i talking about > other utils which amavis-new uses (spamassassin, clamav, etc.) which are > currently started after amavis-new. imho, if more services started in > runlevel with same starting reference, these services started in > alphabetical order, e.g. spamassassin is started after postfix or > sendmail.
You do not nead spamassassin started before amavisd-new. amavisd-new loads a installed spamassassin perl module by his own. A running spamassassin is only useful for interactive checks. Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------ H E L I X Gesellschaft für Software & Engineering mbH ------------------------------------------------------------ Hanauer Landstrasse 52 Telefon (069) 4789 35-30 D-60314 Frankfurt am Main Telefax (069) 4789 35-44 ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.helix-gmbh.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
