ביום ראשון, 26 באוקטובר 2003, 18:47, נכתב על ידי [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > todo for next version:
> > * fix the icon problem (the app does not have an icon for some reason) *
> > compile also the dot program. apparently I am missing some
> > functionality.
> >
> > Here are the links:
> > http://iglu.org.il/pub/Hebrew/diego/kdevelop/
> > http://iglu.org.il/pub/Hebrew/diego/kdevelop/kdevelop-3.0-cvs_20031026.i5
> >86.rpm http://iglu.org.il/pub/Hebrew/diego/kdevelop/kdevelop3cvs.spec
>
> Please change your release to be a value which rpm will consider to be
> less than 1, otherwise unsuspecting users who install your package will be
> stranded with your package when a real kdevelop package is released. This
> is a non-trivial issue, and a similar issue is currently causing users of
> Tex's KDE packages to have problems when upgrading to 9.2. Please apply
> the patch below before you distribute this to too many people.
i see. it looks like a really ugly hack, but i understand why it's needed.
patched locally, in the next release it will be available. 

> Also, this is bad practice (yes, I know it is used by KDE spec file
> templates, but that is no excuse):
>
> find . -type d | egrep kdevelep | sed '1,2d;s,^\.,\%attr(-\,root\,root)
> %dir,' > $RPM_BUILD_DIR/file.list.kdevelop
>
> because you will own many directories which you should not own (/usr,
> /usr/bin, /usr/lib, etc etc). But you can fix those yourself.
so, what is the best remedy for that?
making the file list by my own? 

-- 

diego, 1 Heshvan 5764

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



Reply via email to