I can confirm this, on both my x86 and alpha system. I'll add some extra
weirdness to this:
On my alpha more packages seem to compile than on my intel. Why? I can't
explain it.
Here are my buildoutputs of the affected packages:
http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/alpha/broken/
http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/i586/broken/
(My intel is a recent cooker installation, help up to date with autorpm.
My alpha is a 7.0 installation, I compile all the src.rpm's and keep the
machine up to date with autorpm. May i note that the 264dp over at the
Paris Office is also coping with these issues... I'm wondering if kenobi
is
able to build these src.rpm's it produced.)
I would really apreciate that this issue is solved. I'm quite stuck at
the moment, since I want to install / upgrade packages which are
currently
not building on my alpha. I also don't have a clue on how to procede
from
here (how can I help to help?).
Greetz,
Stefan
> Normally I recompile source packages with pentiumpro or k6 optimizations taking
> them from one of these sites:
> - ftp.ciril.fr
> - ftp.sunet.se
> - sunsite.uio.no
>
> It's about a week that almost all new packages but RPM itself, when I rebuild
> using:
> rpm --rebuild ... on a Dell PII 350 machine or
> rpm --rebuild --target=k6-mandrake-linux on a self build K6III based
> machine
>
> give the following message:
> source package expected, binary found
>
> My installation was originally a 7.1 (Helium) Kernel 2.2.17-0.5mdk which is the
> only package I get from RPMS directory and recompile from the installed source tree
> and, currently, I use rpm-3.0.5-0.9mdk but back-grading to 3.0.4 didn't
> resolve.
>
> Could you please tell me where I'm wrong or check for if source packages are
> correctly build and transmitted.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> D.Parodi
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
