Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>...
> Let's go for a summary of the problems:
> 
> * The "urpmi urpmi" step worked well. After that I had to stop the "urpmi
> --auto-select" because it was scrolling a bazillion of error messages regarding
> /var/lib/rpm/PubKeys. Had to remove the file and manually "rpm --import" the
> keys

Problably a problem of specific extension of rpm 4.2 versus 4.0.4 used in 9.1, a
missing rpm --rebuilddb could be the cause ? Anyway, a urpmi.update -a could be
much nicer after, except if urpmi database is already up-to-date ?

> * There was some conflict with files with some updated packages. Removed the
> offending packages and urpmi --auto-select worked well.

A commend line --skip pkg1,pkg2,...,pkgN can be used in such case, it is
depending on the humor of the moment.

> * It couldn't update libavifile0.7 libaviplayavcodec (and dependent packages)
> due to dependencies. I think this is a problem caused by urpmi batching, since
> when I manually issued an "urpmi libavifile0.7 libaviplayavcodec" it could
> upgrade both flawlessly. Maybe this problem will be more noticeable on the other
> machine since it has many more packages installed.

If you could have saved bug report of urpmi for that... in order to see what is
the cause.

>...
>     gettext-0.11.5-2mdk, kdeutils-3.1-9mdk, screem-0.6.0-1mdk
> 
> in 9.2:
> 
>     gettext-0.11.5-7mdk, kdeutils-3.1.3-20mdk, screem-0.6.2-4mdk
> 
> Add to the list automake, but that's because of the naming (I had automake1.6
> while 9.2 has automake1.7).

Again, it is domage you didn't issue an --bug of urpmi, it is always nice when
something seems to be bad.

> * The last issue is that by rebooting (I didn't upgrade the kernel) I had a dead
> machine: it couldn't find the initrd so it couldn't mount the root directory
> (since it's xfs). Hopefully one of the older kernels I had could boot, ran lilo
> from it and the machine went back to life. I don't understand what happened
> here, really. The other machine has a much more convoluted lilo setup, so I fear
> it won't be as easy to recover.

lilo was problably updated, and lilo upgrade should call lilo by itself.

> Well, I'm impressed by how well the procedure worked. Sure, there were some
> hurdles and the modification in libraries versions wasn't earth shattering (I
> wonder if everything would work as well with a major glibc update) but still
> it's much better that what was available before. Oh, btw, I was using the
> machine (logged in in X) during the whole process. That's incredible. Kudos to
> mandrake developers and contributors.

Yes, but there was still some problems.

Thanks,
Fran�ois.

Reply via email to