tisdagen den 4 november 2003 13.14 skrev Andrey Borzenkov:
> > This is on a up to date 9.2, with ext3, and the new kernel installed with
> > no changes.
> >
> > When trying to use: *NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run, I got:
> > Error: The kernel header file
> > '/lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk/build/include/linux/modversions.h' does
> > not exist.
> > The most likely reason for this is that the kernel header files in
> > '/lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk/build/include' have not been included.
>
> most likely reason for this that you have not used 2.6 patch from
> www.minion.de (that even provides you 2.6-compatible installer).
>
> modversions no more exsts in 2.6
Sorry, no way out with that step.
I downloaded 'NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg#.tar.gz' and open it, and got:
two new files, .manifest and *nvidia-installer. Then I used
'NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run' with ./N.....run --extract-only.
Then I changed the .manifest and *nvidia-installer to the new ones.
When I did ./.nvidia-installer I got:
ERROR: Unable to build the NVIDIA kernel module.
ERROR: Installation has failed. Please see the file
'/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details. You may find suggestions
on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux
driver download page at www.nvidia.com.
In the /var/log/nvidia-installer.log I have: ( I have translated this, as this
is my doughters box to become, but my new AMD processor gave up so I have to
use her 9.2 in swedish)
...
-> Kernel source path: '/lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk/build'
-> Cleaning kernel module build directory.
executing: 'cd ./usr/src/nv; make clean'...
rm -f nv.o os-agp.o os-interface.o os-registry.o nv-linux.o nv_compiler.h
*
.d NVdriver nvidia.o
-> Building kernel module:
executing: 'cd ./usr/src/nv; make
KERNDIR=/lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk/bu
ild module'...
make: *** Ingen regel f�r att skapa m�let "module". Stannar.
-> Error. trans:No rule to create the module. stops
...
regards
guran
--
Mandrake Linux 9.2 kernel-2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk-1-1mdk
Only in a society that has 'a priori' defined what is the truth
can the result from the evolution of life be defined false.
