On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:30:37 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote: > --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On 2003-11-06(Thu) 11:47:57 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: >> since cooker is re-opened again, I'd like to ask all people who have >> upload permissions to main cooker to NOT upload any GNOME 2.5/2.6 package= > s. >>=20 >> I haven't yet decided if I'll push GTK+ 2.4 in cooker, but ATM, I won't >> push 2.3.0 since it is not yet stable and I don't see any new release of >> software using it.. > > Does this mean that, if GTK+ 2.4 is out and binary compatible with 2.2 > (I mean if GNOME 2.4 runs fine under GTK+ 2.4), then you may put 2.4 > into cooker later? Sorry for ignorance, I didn't follow gtk+ > development...
Yes, GTK+ 2.x is backward binary compatible, by design.. -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
