On 2003-11-02(Sun) 12:58:24 +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: > > I am using it for at least a year now without any apparent ill effects; the > > only open question was klogd Oops decoding and most responses I got from > > LKML indicated that klogd is obsolete; now-a-days we have internal symbol > > decoding in both 2.4 (mdk extra) and 2.6 (built in by default) so it is not > > a problem anymore. > > > > The transition is not as easy, configuration file is not compatible so any > > tool messing with it must be updated. Immediately I can think about msec > > and MNF (it has options for logging configuration); webmin is likely to be > > affected too. Anything else? > > > > so is it worth it? If yes it must be done as soon as possible to leave > > enough time for testing. > > > > -andrey > > I say go for it.
I've been using it for a while as well and don't have any problem. I'm all for it, though I'd imagine we will be hearing "Where's the old syslogd????? WHAT'S GOING ON?????" in mdk 10 :-) Abel > > > -- Abel Cheung Linux counter #256983 | http://counter.li.org GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
