Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:48, Pascal Terjan wrote: >> Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
[...] > >>> Mandrake should be more carefull with this, shouldn't it? > >> I'm pretty sure the magazine didn't even bother to tell Mandrakesoft >> they'll distibute the 9.2... > > OK... I'm planning to include a slightly-less-than-single-ISO version of > 9.2 plus the updates and an LG-proof kernel on the cover of an > Australian magazine. It will be aimed at a single purpose: installing a > secure, database-backed Mandrake Linux webserver/mailserver/gateway > machine for developers to use either for real or as a staging area or > an intranet server/testbed. > > What are the rules Mandrake would like me to follow? > > For example, if I include a PLF package or the NVidia/ATI drivers, what > must I change? The distro's name? Licence terms? > > What can I do with the advertising screens? Are Mandrake happy for me to > add extra images to the sequence, one to loudly remind the audience > that this is not an official Mandrake distribution - it's been built > for the magazine - one to advertise Linux contacts in Australia, and so > on? > > What else? The main issue is "Would this be a good ad for Mandrakesoft?". If you built bad quality bugged CDs with Mandrake name, the people will say that mandrake is crap. Maybe just add a notice that they are not official mandrake CDs. -- Warly
