"Michael Irving" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > (the number has correspondance in compssList)
> > I don't even remember why it was set to 1 instead of 0, at least for
> expert...
> >
> Well could you set it back?
done, for now (i just changed some stuff for automated install also)
>
> And what does the number in compssList mean??
>
> there is -40 to 0 to 70 or something... What do they mean??
quote from pkgs.pm:
#- lower bound on the left ( aka 90 means [90-100[ )
%compssListDesc = (
100 => __("mandatory"), #- do not use it, it's for base packages
90 => __("must have"), #- every install have these packages (unless hand de-selected
in expert, or not enough room)
80 => __("important"), #- every beginner/custom install have these packages (unless
not enough space)
#- has minimum X install (XFree86 + icewm)(normal)
70 => __("very nice"), #- KDE(normal)
60 => __("nice"), #- gnome(normal)
50 => __("interesting"),
40 => __("interesting"),
30 => __("maybe"),
20 => __("maybe"),
10 => __("maybe"),#__("useless"),
0 => __("maybe"),#__("garbage"),
#- if the package requires locales-LANG and LANG is chosen, rating += 90
-10 => __("i18n (important)"), #- every install in the corresponding lang have these
packages
-20 => __("i18n (very nice)"), #- every beginner/custom install in the corresponding
lang have theses packages
-30 => __("i18n (nice)"),
);
#- HACK: rating += 50 for some packages (like kapm, cf install_any::setPackages)
#- HACK: rating += 10 if the group is selected and it is not a kde package (aka name
!~ /^k/)
#- HACK: rating += 1 if the group is selected and it is a kde package (aka name
!~ /^k/)
>
> >
> > > IMNHO I think the installer needs a lookover.
> >
> > booh, you naughty :'-(
>
> Sorry. But I don't think that the crypto part failing should blow the rest
> of the install.
for sure!
>
> Also it would be great to have an option where I can tell the installer that
> I have the crypto packages on my own hd.
hum, quite a few stuff to do for this. At least too much to go to normal install
i'd say. I'll have a look...
>
> But I have to say that the installer is the best gfx installer that is
> available as of now. The others quite frankly sucks.. This one just need a
> little bit of more work before it is quite done :)
don't ask too much... and you'll get it :)
