answering those that i do know.
>
> Of course, the problem is that cooker isn't really a distribution at
> all and at any one moment lots of stuff is inconsistent and broken
> with each other. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a secondary version of
> cooker which at least could be installed without conflicts or library
> errors? That would involve minimal testing and could be done
> automatically, one would think.
cooker was never meant to be stable. it you had a good day then it might
work, but then again, maybe not. that's why we treasure our contributers and
testers, because you're going to find big bugs in cooker. and bad behavior.
and things which seem to work, but actually do not.
>
> Anyway, some random problems with recent cookers:
>
> ldconfig / ld.so both supply ldconfig but having missing other
> files?
>
ld.so alreasdy obsolete ldconfig. yes it does have fewer files in ld.so than
ldconfig but this is normal, the compat stuff have been removed, that's all.
>
> sh-utils, procps have conflicts
>
> If you're updating ocaml mdk version, couldn't you update to
> the latest (3.01 or .02) ?
>
i made the new mdk version. i only updated to show everyone that all is fine
when you build with a new tcltk (see previous messages) i'm not really the
maintainer. :)
> PS: I'm not reading this list any more because the traffic is
> too high. A web interface would be very nice...
>
denis??
