Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 08:15:18AM -0400, Pedro Rosa wrote:
> > In any case, I believe that it would be more correct to insert an
> > alternative bash-static rpm into the distro. bash.static could either
> > coexist with or substitute dynamically linked bash.
>
> While you are totally correct, did you have a look at sash, the stand-alone
> shell? It is statically linked and also comes with a linked in version of
> gzip, tar and some more. Yes, it's not bash, but for rescue operations it's
> totally fine.
>
Didn't note it before... Yeap it looks great. Specially the aliasing
features. Thanx.
> Alexander Skwar
> --
> Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
> Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
> ICQ: 7328191
Ektanoor
