On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:20:44PM -0400, pgeorges wrote:
> I had the same problem, and after a massive rpm -ivh --force /cooker/*,
> nobody complains
> any longer about the missing /lib/libdl.so.1 : I guess it is really
> deprecated.
But what about non-mandrake binaries, without source?
Is there a good reason not to include ld-linux.so.1? Like a way to run
old binaries without the lib? Or a major security hole when the lib is
installed?
ld-linux.so.1.9.5 + libdl.so.1.9.5 are <30k, so size should not be the
problem.
