Submitted 27-Aug-00 by Guillaume Cottenceau:
> . still beta software, will certainly be optimized
Which is why I qualified with "at this point" :)
> To me, it's not enough to tell that we can't use it. The p200 machines are
> quite old now.
I agree, boxes like this are not the norm. Many people today consider a
K6-2 350 to be a "low-end" machine. You can't continually build to the
lowest common denominator without stifling progress.
> I remember problems with Cyrix p-150+ to play mp3. (very slow)
I tried it (once) on an AMD 5x86/133. Not good :p
> Its design is more recent, to me it's normal to goal more cpu intensive
> stuff.
It is. I suppose that my point was that Ogg is not _yet_ a solution for all
machines, and is impractical (though not unusable) on truly low end
machines.
--
Anton Graham GPG ID: 0x18F78541
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RSA key available upon request
If you think the pen is mightier than the sword, the next time someone pulls
out a sword I'd like to see you get up there with your Bic.
