Would it be too difficult to build scsi support into the standard kernels?
My boot disk is scsi, so I always have to roll my own kernels - not much
of a problem except for the time, with the frequent updates from cooker.
I always use matroxfb in my kernels (I have a Matrox G400-32). Since
2.2.17-1 this has not been possible. The kernel documentation
fb/matroxfb.txt advises _not_ to use the VESA framebuffer. With the
latest kernels I have to build without framebuffer so that I can boot
- with framebuffer I get some message about framebuffer trying to use
wrong memory location (doesn't get into any logs so I have to rely on
my memory for that).
I have gone back to using 2.2.17-0.24mdk and initscripts-4.97-43mdk,
which serves me well but I would prefer to move forward instead of
back.
There must be many of us with G400s and scsi disks
--
------------------------------------------------------
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wrexham, UK KDE - the professionals' choice
------------------------------------------------------
