Pedro Rosa wrote:
> 
> This is not exactly an error. It is more a feature. I don't have any
> mail program in the building machine. So "at" fails during compile time.
> Maybe an add up to requires would help to overpass this situation? This
> problem could be not so self-evident to some people.
> 

I'm not sure this is an easy patch.
It seems more a conceptual problem: if there's no mail program
installed, "at" should log the error in some other way. 
To avoid a build when no mails programs are installed, we would need
different BuildRequires tags in "or" between them. I'm not sure this can
be done (anyone knows how?).

Enzo

--  Enzo Maggi
    Mandrakesoft  -  http://www.mandrakesoft.com

Reply via email to