[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takacs Sandor) writes:
> On 6 Nov 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > > for i in *;do rpm -qp $i --requires|grep libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3;done |wc
> > > -l
> > > 104
> > >
> > > I see it correctly? 104 packages of the current cooker uses the old
> > > version of libstdc++? How can I upgrade an older cooker to the current, if
> > > 104 of 1600 packages use an old lib?
> >
> > Hmmm.... "you can't"? :-)
> >
> > Seriously enough, we are in the process of rebuilding, and if you mix the
> > fact that some maintainers are slower than others, and the fact that some
> > stuff needs work and time to get done (kde2 for example) you end up with
> > the current situation :-).
>
> Why not contain the new libstdc++ package a symlink from the new lib to
> this old name? I think this solve the problem (ugly, but working :)
The names are different to force the programmers to recompile
--
dam's
