On Wednesday 08 November 2000 04:05, you wrote:
> Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't wanna sound rude, but Pixel (?) once said, that it is too
>
> humm that's should be me :
>
> (chmou@matrix)[~]-% rpm -q --changelog kernel|grep -c pixel
> 0
> (chmou@matrix)[~]-% rpm -q --changelog kernel|grep -c chmouel
> 94
>
> > troublesome for him to maintain yet another set of kernels (which at
> > least I can very well understand). So, if you really want ext3, write a
> > kernel spec file that features ext3. Maybe this will make him change his
> > mind.
> > No, *I* am not gonna write one, because I don't care about ext3 (I'm
> > using reiserfs).
>
> writing a spec file who don't enable by default ext3 is easy add a
> kernel with ext3 is doable (but ugly) make a cohabitation of ext3 and
> reiserfs is not adviced (name conflict and not tested). So the
> solution would be :
>
> wait for kernel24 and put as default a new journalising fs (xfs come
> in my mind)
> make a special ext3 kernel
so people who want to install ext3 fs could not use others fs (for testing
purpose for example);-(( .
but it's better than now ;->
