On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:04, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> We can't do everything.
This is FAR from everything...
> We do use MandrakeUpdate for security updates. It already costs resources
> because changing something means:
>
> - doing it for a number of old distribs (7.2, 7.1, 7.0, 6.1)
> - backporting the specfiles that have changed with newer versions of RPM
> - troubleshooting the dependency problems, thus making other packages
>
> Think two minutes: what would you like to see in the updates? obviously,
> for example kde-2, gnome-1.2, xmms-1.2.4, rpm-4, XFree-4, for older
> distribs such as 7.0. This is an *enormous* amount of work, and, come on,
> we release everything on the web very conveniently, so why not upgrading
> or installing the 7.2..
It's 7.2 I'm talking about!!! So what you're saying is that if I want to
upgrade my system to the latest stable releases of products, and I want to
use my distribtion-companies own rpm I have to use a unstable build of the
whole dis (cooker, and yes, it is unstable!). This is bullshit, think about
it. In one way you're saying that we (the customers) should install an MDK,
never upgrade anything except if it's a security upgrade, and never get any
new version of a program (even when the new version are a lot more stable)
except for when the next release of the distribution is out... ?
--
\ Christian A Str�mmen /
\ Number1/NumeroUno @ Undernet - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
\ Web: www.realityx.net - Cell: +47 911 43 948 /
� �Live your life by your dreams,
� � �not by the limits of reality...
