Mike Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would certainly be ready to part with my hard earned shekels
> for a service such as Neal is suggesting, however it would be
> even better if such a service also included fixes for "non security"
> bugs found after the product release, and not just more "interesting"
> versions.
>
> BTW: Would I be correct in assuming that the new glibc is the main
> culprit for incompatibility between Cooker and 7.2, and once we move
> past this, at least for a little while subsequent Cookers will be more
> compatible with subsequent releases?
actually the glibc are binary compatible, thus a --nodeps would probably
make the packages work. but well it's --nodeps, it's not really the best
thing to do.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
