Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Today chmouel installed and there was no such problems. Thanks. > But anyway cooker is said to not be stable, I would suggest to never > install it on a machine where you have partitions on which there is > significant amount of "not to loose" data.. No, better that the installer keeps its grubby fingers out of partitions which have not been given to it to write in. Just why on earth did the cooker installer give you checkboxes to format each of your FAT32 (Windows) partitions? You must realise that you do not OWN the machine you are installing on, only the partition(s) explicitly given you to install in. That they did not own the world was a hard lesson for MicroSoft to eventually begin to learn ... -- Regards, Ron. [AU]
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Udo Weber
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure stephen
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Ron Stodden
- [Cooker] John Johnson
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Johan Rehnberg
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Johan Rehnberg
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker Install Failure Vincent Meyer
