On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 06:04:40PM +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It's rather sad to see that SGI has written a patch to Anaconda to support > XFS, and they don't care about our installer :-(.. Want to know why? Because Mandrake is not taken seriously in the enterprise market space. I have talked about this here in the past but nobody seems to be interested in dealing with this issue. That being as it is, I use Mandrake at home but lost the battle at work and we use RedHat. Why? Because nobody in our business development department could be convinced that Mandrake has staying power due to their weakness in the enterprise market. b. -- Brian J. Murrell
- [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-release Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-release Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-release Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-release Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-release Tim McKenzie
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-release Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-rele... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS ... Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-... Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-rele... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-... Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS ... civileme
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS ... Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] SGI's XFS pre-rele... Eugenio Diaz
