Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 19 Feb 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Does it really create compatibility problems if it's compiled in but > > > not mounted? > > > > with tools see what the output of /proc/partitions on a devfs system. > > > > > I can understand backward compatibility, but at some point we need to > > > sacrifice backward compatibility for progress no? Any idea when that > > > will be for devfs? > > > > when all tools will devfs compatible. > > > > I thought that devfs+devfsd = backward compatible? alas not for everything. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
- [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel 2.4.1-16mdk Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel 2.4.1-16... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel 2.4.... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in ker... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in ker... Sebastian Dransfeld
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working i... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel ... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in ker... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel 2.4.... Van Holland
- RE: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel ... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in ker... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs not working in kernel 2.4.1-16... Brian J. Murrell
